The very short answer is NO! Let me explain.
Every paper you will ever write in college will ask you to narrow your topic and the 2Research Report is no different. In fact, in this case you should be more conscious of narrowing your topic because your clients want to know about your expertise. You must sell them on the information you have that will help them. Information comes in discrete bits that is transform by thinking into knowledge. You need the information first before you can offer solutions to a problem. That's what you are being asked to do here.
But you have to start somewhere and that somewhere are the sites that I've put up for each of the bill topics--see the link at the top of your LobSim org page. These are sites that describe a bill that is currently being debated in the congress. In my example (see the 2RR sample) I've taken the green-jobs bill and started to try to find my (and my org--Minerva's) place in the conversation. We are a grassroots watchdog organization that exists to help those who are powerless or those with very little power. Therefore, we will be trying to lobby those writing the bill to include items in it that will help our clients. In my example, I will want to continue researching green jobs to see who is out there training people for these jobs and if they fit into our mission statement then we will try to promote them. But before we can help anyone we have to find the information that's current about green jobs so that we will have the facts and figures and arguments ready to deploy with those (in this case the congress) who have the job or making laws.
As a staff member in your org, You are between the lawmakers who want to craft a bill (e.g. the green jobs bill) and your clients who you want to support. You are the expert who channels the desires of your clients by way of the information you gather into viable arguments that will influence the passage of a bill. Information is power. What you know can be transformed into knowledge that can then become rules (laws) that everyone who is affected must comply. And if a particular bill has the potential to hurt your clients then you have to gather the information necessary to influence amendments to that law. On the other hand, if the bill being proposed is what your clients want then it is up to you to persuade lawmakers to pass that bill and you then need information to prevent those writing the bill from adding amendments that will change or dilute the law that you want. Either way you are the person who both the congress person and your clients need because you have the information that can be used to support the arguments for passage of the bill or for amending the bill, or for stopping the bill. Information is power.
Information needs also to be specific, detailed, and appropriate if it is to be effective. You need to find an aspect of these broad topics (education, health care, alternative energies, pollution) and carve out for yourself a place where you can be an expert. An expert drills down deep into a subject and comes up with information that is not readily available to the ordinary person. Experts know dates, they know people, they know statistics, they know trends, and they know the conversation, the gossip, the backstory intimately. In other words, a lobbyist cannot be a generalist because he/she will be ignored. "We already know that. Tell us what we don't know and most of all tell us what we can use to help our cause." That's what your clients will say to you. And detailed information is what you need to find and put into your report for this assignment.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Do I write in general about bill topics--education, health care, alternative energies, or pollution?
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Your LobSim Org Home (Wiki) Page
The main home page of each LobSim org will function as a wiki for the organization. A wiki is different from a blog. A blog gathers new information in reverse chronological order. A blog is good at establishing and maintaining a relationship between a writer and his/her audience. A wiki archives and manages information. I allows visitors to add, edit, and change material. A blog can be seen as taking the place of a bulletin board where a wiki takes the place of a project binder. (source: http://mplictechtrain.blogspot.com/2007/04/what-is-difference-between-blog-and.html)
You will help your fellow staff members to construct and maintain a knowledge base concerning your organization that will begin on the first page of your org's LobSim site. At the top of each org home (wiki) page I have posed the question: What is your (leader's) stance on the four bill topics. Start with possible answers to this question. In this way, you will construct a knowledge base by submitting data to the page that follows the personal and political point of view of your particular org and its leader. The information that you add has to be consistent, topical, and reliable.
The first stage of making this knowledge base is to have all the members submit information that appears to be a part of an answer to the question: What is Xs stance on . . . . The second stage is to take that information and organize it into fields and categories, creating new pages if necessary. And the third stage is to revise the information already in the categories and add more information.
You start this process by going onto your org page, selecting Edit this Page (in the top right corner), posting your information under the bill topic categories that have already been placed into the page, and then hit Save (again in the top right corner). Do this for every submission you make. Initially add a line space between your submission and the others on the page. Changes to the page will be logged in Recent Site Activity in the left frame of each page.
You must try to detach your ego from your writing on a wiki. Someone will be going onto the page changing, reordering, and/or eliminating what you have written. This is the nature of the work in a wiki. You must do this kind of editing and it will be done to your writing, too. Get used to it and use it to your advantage. Your writing will resist changes by others if you do it in an exemplary fashion. Simple as that. Working in a wiki is a matter of the crowd coming to a consensus. Note: Each change to the home (wiki) org page is recorded in the history section of each page.
You will help your fellow staff members to construct and maintain a knowledge base concerning your organization that will begin on the first page of your org's LobSim site. At the top of each org home (wiki) page I have posed the question: What is your (leader's) stance on the four bill topics. Start with possible answers to this question. In this way, you will construct a knowledge base by submitting data to the page that follows the personal and political point of view of your particular org and its leader. The information that you add has to be consistent, topical, and reliable.
The first stage of making this knowledge base is to have all the members submit information that appears to be a part of an answer to the question: What is Xs stance on . . . . The second stage is to take that information and organize it into fields and categories, creating new pages if necessary. And the third stage is to revise the information already in the categories and add more information.
You start this process by going onto your org page, selecting Edit this Page (in the top right corner), posting your information under the bill topic categories that have already been placed into the page, and then hit Save (again in the top right corner). Do this for every submission you make. Initially add a line space between your submission and the others on the page. Changes to the page will be logged in Recent Site Activity in the left frame of each page.
You must try to detach your ego from your writing on a wiki. Someone will be going onto the page changing, reordering, and/or eliminating what you have written. This is the nature of the work in a wiki. You must do this kind of editing and it will be done to your writing, too. Get used to it and use it to your advantage. Your writing will resist changes by others if you do it in an exemplary fashion. Simple as that. Working in a wiki is a matter of the crowd coming to a consensus. Note: Each change to the home (wiki) org page is recorded in the history section of each page.
LobSim Org Clients and LobSim Blogs
Who are the clients for these three orgs? The congresswoman's clients are of course her constituents in Chester Co. Mr. Fantorum's clients are a series of businesses that include banks, for profit educational firms, energy companies, and drug companies. Prof Smith and Minerva work for consumer protection agencies, environmental orgs, green energy business, and the AMA.
How does all this affect the writing you will do? It affects mainly the process toward producing the writing, esp the proposal/arg piece that will lay out the bill you and your org want passed. The scandals and opportunities, the clients and their wishes all go to produce the context under which the proposal you write is constructed. Here is one example: If there is a scandal for Mr. F then those you who work for him must fend off those in the other orgs who will want to criticize your lobbying firm and him and by implication your justification for some part of the bill that you all are pushing. Therefore, you have to be aware of what the other orgs are proposing as well.
Staff members of each blog must read the other two blogs and the research reports that they are writing. You want to help or discredit the other org so that your proposal gains strength. The resources you will use to help your clients to get what they want from the legislation your are proposing will include statements about what the other org is doing or not doing to affect change.
Much of this pre-proposal writing is going to take place in the blogs the three different orgs produce. The news about scandals or successes of the three orgs is going to be broadcast on the LobSim Portal page and on Twitter. If you miss a juicy change in the status of your employer and do not act accordingly to help him or her weather a storm or take advantage of a positive outcome, you will be put into a negative position. Be alert and react immediately on your blog or on Twitter to the changes that will be posted on the LobSim Portal site.
How does all this affect the writing you will do? It affects mainly the process toward producing the writing, esp the proposal/arg piece that will lay out the bill you and your org want passed. The scandals and opportunities, the clients and their wishes all go to produce the context under which the proposal you write is constructed. Here is one example: If there is a scandal for Mr. F then those you who work for him must fend off those in the other orgs who will want to criticize your lobbying firm and him and by implication your justification for some part of the bill that you all are pushing. Therefore, you have to be aware of what the other orgs are proposing as well.
Staff members of each blog must read the other two blogs and the research reports that they are writing. You want to help or discredit the other org so that your proposal gains strength. The resources you will use to help your clients to get what they want from the legislation your are proposing will include statements about what the other org is doing or not doing to affect change.
Much of this pre-proposal writing is going to take place in the blogs the three different orgs produce. The news about scandals or successes of the three orgs is going to be broadcast on the LobSim Portal page and on Twitter. If you miss a juicy change in the status of your employer and do not act accordingly to help him or her weather a storm or take advantage of a positive outcome, you will be put into a negative position. Be alert and react immediately on your blog or on Twitter to the changes that will be posted on the LobSim Portal site.
LobSim Org PICs (People in Charge)
Who stands behind the heads of the orgs: Rep. Modigliani, Mr. Fantorum, and Dr. Smith and speaks for them? I do. Your retiring, soft spoken instructor. I am the dynamic Maggie Mo. I am the fiery Mr. Fantastic. I am the demure but scathingly direct Prof Smith. Not only will I speak for them to you but I will have as only the supreme being does, control over their lives and fortunes. I can give Rep M a nervous breakdown. I can give Mr. F a male lover. I can give Prof. S a scandal where she is accused of misappropriating funds. I can also give Rep Mo's opponent (Mr. Singleton) a major misstep (e.g. he belonged to a satanic cult in h.s.) in the election where she now sees a way to bring him down (with your help) and be reelected. I can give Mr. F a very rich and anonymous donor who is ready to give him millions if only he ??? I can give Prof S a juicy report by a whistle blower high in the employ of a rapacious corporation. You will have to respond to these events with stategies to help your employer and his/her clients.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)